On 11/17/20 8:30 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Mark Sapiro writes: > > > And several years ago (in the 2.1.5 timeframe), RedHat modified their > > Mailman package to be FHS compliant for the specific purpose of avoiding > > SELinux security violations. > > Is it possible FHS non-conformance is related to the OP's situation?
It's possible, but all we know is the OP moved lists from one server to another - see <https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-users@python.org/thread/IQUVN5XGOTYR3VM3ZGA4W4RF7SF3WVMK/>. We have no idea how Mailman is installed on the new server. > Are we FHS conformant? If not, why would it be a bad idea to become > FHS-conformant (aaside from the effort required)? For Mailman 2.1, it requires RedHat's patch. See <https://wiki.list.org/x/17892071> For Mailman 3 putting layout: fhs in the [mailman] section of mailman.cfg should create an FHS compliant layout. -- Mark Sapiro <m...@msapiro.net> The highway is for gamblers, San Francisco Bay Area, California better use your sense - B. Dylan ------------------------------------------------------ Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman-users-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/mailman-users.python.org/ Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9 Searchable Archives: https://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users@python.org/ https://mail.python.org/archives/list/mailman-users@python.org/
