On 1 Feb 2013, at 15:13, Mateusz Parzonka wrote: > On 1 Feb 2013, at 14:50, Benny Kj?r Nielsen wrote: > >> No, and this is a well-intentioned question: Why do you need it? >> > To harshly enforce my recipient to read the mail with the same > formatting (line width) i have written it?
Exactly :-) > Hmm, after some re-evaluation of this intent and have to consider this > a bad idea and dropped it. Thank you, for forcing me to think this > through! :-) And I didn't even get to describe all the problems with quoting hard wrapped lines :-) This email looks beautiful in its raw format (??U), that is, if the mailing list software didn't ruin it (I should look for alternatives). >> Note that MailMate uses soft line wrapping when the email is >> generated (the `format=flowed` standard). > > I now see the point. Now I just need to convince a few hundred more million people. Thanks for trying out MailMate. -- Benny
