On 24 Jun 2013, at 16:04, Bill Cole wrote:
I tried replying to a message today with a syntactically valid
Reply-To today and was startled to see that MM ignored it, putting the
"From" of the original in the To field and not even popping up the
dialog that sometimes offers reply options. The only unusual thing
about this message is that it was programmatically generated by a CGI
behind a web contact form which protects against backscatter spam by
using one local address in both the From and To headers and as the
SMTP envelope sender and recipient (causing the local mail system to
put it in Return-Path and X-Original-To as well.)
I have not yet tested with other messages, but since my own MM config
is the product of many untracked customizations under the hood across
many versions, it is conceivable that I've found some odd corner case
specific to my rig. Has anyone else on the list noticed this?
I think I fixed a reply-related bug some time ago, but maybe I
introduced a new one (although I do have some automated reply tests).
You can try sending me the headers of the message if possible. Maybe
something triggers a bug in the parsing/handling of the Reply-To header.
--
Benny
_______________________________________________
mailmate mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
