On 2014-09-29 08:16, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
> Muting was implemented to be used on mailing lists where you would not > normally be the direct recipient. For example, the message you just sent was > from you to [email protected]. If I had muted the thread then I would > not have seen it. But if you had replied to my email address directly then I > would still have seen the message due to the exception described. That make sense. Thank you for the explanation. > My understanding of "mute" is that it automatically marks further messages in > the same thread as read. I would expect it to do this regardless of whether > my address is in the To: field. However, the Mute command has never had any > effect on further messages when I use it in MailMate, so I'm trying to > determine how my understanding is incomplete. > > I assume that in this case the thread is a thread of personal correspondence > in which you are an explicit recipient (although maybe one of many explicit > recipients). Unfortunately, no, I've never tried to use muting on a thread in which I am an explicit recipient. I've only tried to use it on the MailMate mailing list, which is the only high-volume mailing list to which I'm subscribed. It seems to have no effect. > Well, strong muting is perhaps what you would expect from muting, but you run > the risk of muting too much. I will try setting that preference and see if it helps.
_______________________________________________ mailmate mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
