On 4 Oct 2016, at 10:21 AM CDT, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:

On 3 Oct 2016, at 23:53, Sam Hathaway wrote:

Yes! Thank you, that was it. I didn’t expect that having an HTML alternative for a signature would force messages into HTML mode when they otherwise wouldn’t be.

When users need an HTML signature it's usually because company policy requires it to be used for all outgoing emails. I had not considered that anyone would expect it to only be included for emails using HTML for other reasons (I know you are not requesting this behavior).

If you’re interested in UX suggestions for this feature, see attached.

By the way, a bug in the signature editor meant that just disabling the HTML signature (and not clearing the text field) did not actually disable it. This is fixed in the latest test release.

Thanks as always for your prompt responses and quick fixes!
-sam
_______________________________________________
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate

Reply via email to