I second that. I interact with a client organization that insists on
embedding images in their signatures. As the result, I have a couple
hundred files on my disk with their logo, for example. Furthermore,
after a few rounds of replies and forwards, all those images increase
the vertical space of mails and some signature images invariably gets
lost and are shown missing. Using links in signatures would really be
more friendly.
Robert
On 31 Jan 2017, at 16:18, Benny Kjær Nielsen wrote:
I'm afraid there are no good options and the “best” option is not
supported by MailMate (`multipart/related` mentioned above).
Personally, I'm not a fan of embedded images, because it's a somewhat
silly waste of space. Images take up much more space than text and
they are going to be in every email going forward and back taking up
space on both servers and personal computers.
Therefore, if you must have an image in your signature then put an
image on a server and link to it using `https:`. Some email clients
are going to block it by default, but the other options are not going
to work much better. It might also be a benefit that grumpy email
client users like me can then still use disk space for something else
than signatures :)
_______________________________________________
mailmate mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
