On 15 Jul 2018, at 23:25 (-0400), Michael Hucka wrote:

Did I do something in a past exchange to trigger this rather hostile reply? I honestly don't remember, but if I did, I apologize.

No, it is my place to apologize. I absolutely did not intend to come across as personally hostile and I am sorry that I did.

I spend much of my time managing mail systems and I AM hostile towards patterns of using mail that work against their general design, causing unnecessary frustration (like yours with Google's Trash policy) and often (particularly with smaller mail systems) performance troubles. I do not understand where the pattern of Trash-as-Archive comes from, but it is surprisingly common and at the root of an inordinate fraction of user complaints even in environments *without* auto-empty mechanisms in place.

I'm also not really sure why you presume to tell others on this list how they should manage their mail; you're free to do as you wish, but you should realize that others may have workflows that attempt to address other needs. Some of those workflows may be based on even longer experiences than yours. (My archives go back to 1987 and I currently have 1,412,484 messages, as of a few moments ago, although to be fair, some the 1990's are probably Usenet postings due to using an Emacs-based mail & news reader for a long time.) Maybe you're better than me at deciding what can really be "just deleted" on the spot, but after many years of trying, I've decided it's better for me to keep everything (yes, including what is clearly spam).

I'm *not* very good at it but I recognize non-retention as important. I also retain all of my delivered spam, because spam control is a professional specialty of mine. I have 246 IMAP mailboxes in my main account, and another 269 mailboxes for messages prior to 2006, imported from Eudora and only loaded on my primary machine inn an "offline account" that has no backing server.

The approach I've found helpful is to:

(1) Automatically file new unread messages in mailboxes other than INBOX when they fit some recurring logical class that correlates to how important it is to read and/or how long it makes sense to keep it. (2) Automatically delete 'old' messages when they meet well-defined criteria for deletion, even if those criteria are very broad.

An example of (1) is that each mailing list I subscribe to has its own IMAP mailbox. An example of (2) is that each of my mailboxes that is associated with a mailing list which has a public archive is purged of messages older than a month which are not in threads that I have participated in by an associated Smart Mailbox with a rule.

--
Bill Cole
[email protected] or [email protected]
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Currently Seeking Steadier Work: https://linkedin.com/in/billcole
_______________________________________________
mailmate mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate

Reply via email to