On 1 Jan 2019, at 21:42, Rick Cogley wrote:

how are folk dealing with this?

I’m new to MM but I’m using EagleFiler for filing. It just copies each email as an `.eml` file and prunes the duplicates. You can encrypt the store, but if you choose not to, EagleFiler just stores the files in `Files` in a structure like this:

~~~~~
…/Mail Archive ❯ pwd
/path/to/my/EagleFiler/Mail Archive
…/Mail Archive ❯ ls -la
total 0
drwxr-xr-x      8 rcogley  staff      256 Jan  2 10:51 .
drwxr-xr-x      4 rcogley  staff      128 Jan  2 10:51 ..
drwxr-xr-x  52365 rcogley  staff  1675680 Jan  2 10:51 Files
drwxr-xr-x@ 6 rcogley staff 192 Jan 2 10:50 Mail Archive.eflibrary
drwxr-xr-x      2 rcogley  staff       64 Dec 31 12:22 Notes
drwxr-xr-x     21 rcogley  staff      672 Dec 31 19:26 Smart Folders
drwxr-xr-x 3 rcogley staff 96 Jan 2 10:43 Temporary Items.nobackup drwxr-xr-x 2 rcogley staff 64 Dec 31 12:22 To Import (Mail Archive)
~~~~~

EagleFiler itself then becomes a way to search the archive of emails you have. To me it’s good enough.

EagleFiler or any other external archival tool it certainly a reasonable tactic. Anything that puts scores of thousands of files in a single directory (as the 52363 files in "Files" shown) has some risk of making the sorts of mistake in handling very large directories that have plagued software practically forever, however an archive & indexing tool that consciously and intentionally builds such a thing is probably better at handling it than an IMAP client which just happens to create it as a side effect of mimicking how users handle messages.
_______________________________________________
mailmate mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate

Reply via email to