On 21 Aug 2020, at 19:53, Greg Earle wrote: > According to CVE-2020-12619 > > https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-12619 > > [...] > > Even though this is a different CVE than the ones mentioned in the ZDNET > article, maybe this is where they got the version of MailMate used in the > tests. > > (How do they come up with this stuff? I mean, who the heck is even using > MailMate 1.10 or earlier anymore?)
It can take a long time to publish a paper. The authors did contact me long ago and that's why this issue was already fixed. I just think it would have been nice if they had included the version number in the paper :) -- Benny https://freron.com/become_a_mailmate_patron/ _______________________________________________ mailmate mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
