I wanted to quickly thank the users who offered patient and helpful responses 
to my challenge.

The use of email accounts as the foundation of “internet identity” seems to be 
the most significant issue, and I certainly understand the kind of disasters 
that can result from a compromised an email account.

I originally asked the question in response to reports about some organizations 
pursuing supposedly stronger (or at least less convenient) security than what 
most of us currently rely on. I’m not sure anyone really suggested a reason to 
make access to email more difficult than it already is, and there was some 
pointed criticism of Outlook’s proprietary authentication system.

This all boils down to a very hard and deeply philosophical problem. The 
question of, “Who are you?”, in its many forms has always been challenging, 
even before networked computers existed. Right now, I see a range of systems 
that address this need, some fairly solid like Google’s account validation, and 
others that are more susceptible to known attacks. Email has always been a sort 
of Swiss Army knife that can be hijacked for all sorts of needs. So here we 
are, still fumbling with email, a lingering relic of a time when the internet 
was a smaller and somewhat friendlier place. FWIW, my first internet email 
address was a “bang path” routed through “uunet”, and before that I was 
connected via a dialup account on BIX (the Byte Magazine Information eXchange 
service).

Anyway, thanks again.

Glenn P. Parker
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
mailmate mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate

Reply via email to