Gil Bahat <[email protected]> wrote: > additionally, if all providers were to respect the > non-standard-but-should-be x-auto-response-suppress , it would do well to > stop this from hitting prudent transactional senders.
They ought to implement RFC 3834. > funny thing is, this is a microsoft-specific (well, outlook-specific) > standard and yet not supported by office online or outlook.com. How utterly crap. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/ Tyne, Dogger: South veering west or northwest 5 or 6. Moderate or rough, becoming slight or moderate. Rain then fair. Poor becoming good. _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list [email protected] http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop
