On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Laura Atkins <la...@wordtothewise.com> wrote: > >> On Sep 3, 2015, at 2:40 PM, Jim Popovitch <jim...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Brandon Long <bl...@google.com> wrote: >>> In general, I'd be surprised if we spam folder mailop, though given it's a >>> mailing list and several of the participants have dmarc p=reject or >>> p=quaruntine enabled and the list isn't set up to handle that, not really >>> surprised. >>> >>> Brandon >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Franck Martin <fmar...@linkedin.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Mike Reed <mikeree...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >> >> Ha! Here's a great example Brandon. Franck's email, referenced > > That’s because gmail is listening to LinkedIn. And LinkedIn, by policy, says > that no mail with a linkedin.com address should be delivered unless it is > authenticated by LinkedIn.
Yep, and that is my point of how and why it is broken, but that horse has been beat to death already. Customer looses, no identifiable person gains. -Jim P. _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop
