On 01/21/16 17:23, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
Because it works on NOT matching instead of matching they don't get
the same advantages as matching systems. If they try to fake one of
those subjects it only helps them pass one of hundreds of tests. So at
best their fake will make an opportunity to detect ham become neutral
on the phrase.
Poisoning doesn't work against my system. Misspelling makes it easier
to identify spammers. And eventually the spammer has to convince you
to do something and that's where they get caught.
If you're doing it just on the subject, ok I'll go with that..
If you're doing it on the body you're probably working against prior art
of a 2004 patent.
Regards,
Michelle
OK - which patent is that? I'm doing it against the first part of the
body, the text in links, the name part of the from address, the php
script references, the header structure, and behavioral flags.
--
Marc Perkel - Sales/Support
supp...@junkemailfilter.com
http://www.junkemailfilter.com
Junk Email Filter dot com
415-992-3400
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop