>> RFC 5782 says that a live DNSxL does list 127.0.0.2 to show that it's >> alive, and does not list 127.0.0.1 to show that it's not wildcarded. >> We published that in 2010 but it was in draft form for quite a while >> before that. For IPv6 BLs, you list ::ffff:127.0.0.2 and don't list >> ::ffff:127.0.0.1. For name BLs, you list TEST and don't list INVALID. > >> I have a script that runs once a week to test all >> the BLs I use for 127.0.0.2 and 127.0.0.1. It comments out any that >> fail and sends me a note. I think I've caught one or two abandoned >> ones from my list that way. > >Not every DNSBL conforms to these rules. So:
You can't make everyone follow the rules, but I have to say that it's been a while since I've seen a BL that I care about that doesn't. R's, John _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list [email protected] https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
