My meta complaint was, it the traffic is going thru the mailing-list and being re-sent, it's not the original senders' any more, and the DKIM/DMARC stuff is bound to fail.
Aloha, Michael. -- Michael J Wise | Microsoft | Spam Analysis | "Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed." | Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool ? -----Original Message----- From: SM [mailto:s...@resistor.net] Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 3:09 PM To: Michael Wise <michael.w...@microsoft.com>; mailop@mailop.org Subject: Re: [mailop] Gmail throttles anyway Hi Michael, At 17:27 04-02-2016, Michael Wise wrote: >If you're going to do something that will break the DKIM signature >as a matter of course, >You should remove the DKIM signature, and maybe re-sign it with your own. > >You shouldn't break the signature and then forward what was once >goodmail with a now busted signature. The issue with removing a DKIM signature which would get broken is that it is not easy to reverse the removal in future. It is better [1] to treat the "broken" DKIM signature as unsigned. Regards, -sm 1. This depends on the receivers you are sending mail to. _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
