>> List-Unsubcribe: <https://www.spammersr.us/unsub/2908duskejs> >> List-Unsubscribe-Post: mailaddr=some...@receipient.de&key=0209023
>If there is a requirement from MUA developers for an https-based >non-interactive unsubscribe - and >researching whether that's the case and what their actual requirements are >would be the first step - then I'm >sure the IETF would be open to a standard to include that metadata in an >email, outside the RFC 2369 set of >headers. When you click the spam button in gmail, it often asks whether you want to unsubscribe as well as mark it as spam. That seems like a pretty strong use case for this. >A new RFC, or an extension of RFC 2369 to add a new List-Something header >would make the whole idea cleaner >and more robust than imposing structure on the existing List-Unsubscribe >process, and wouldn't have much >significant impact on rollout (as it doesn't change significantly the amount >of new code needing to be >deployed at both ends of the protocol to support it). That was my thought. >[2] I like the idea of an MUA with a "meh" button that asks list senders to >send less meh mail, or >unsubscribe me if they can't manage that. I doubt there are enough mailers that would interpret that reasoanbly to be worthwhile. The ESPs I know don't think they send any meh mail. R's, John _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
