No, it only differs between countries (=domains) but signing is the same
for transactional and commercial per each domain.

There should also only be one signing for each domain.


On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 6:29 PM, Jonathan Leist <jleis...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Does the signing differ between your bulk and transactional mail?
>
> If I remember correctly, we ran into an issue with double-signing, where
> our users' header-from aligned signature was given priority over our
> signature, which was the one we were using for their FBL.
>
> On Aug 4, 2017 4:38 PM, "Torsten Reinert via mailop" <mailop@mailop.org>
> wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> Does anyone else experience drops in Yahoo! FBL complaints?
>
> We are no longer receiving the FBL feed for our commercial emails while
> our transactional traffic continues to receive FBL traffic (both sent via
> the same domain but different addresses).
>
> Since the FBL is domain-based this seemed odd considering the domain(s)
> across batch and transactional are the same.
>
> Thanks,
> Torsten
>
> ____________________________
>
> *Torsten Reinert*
>
> Global Deliverability Manager
>
>
> Email: tors...@groupon.com
>
> Groupon Inc. | www.groupon.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
>
>


-- 

____________________________

*Torsten Reinert*

Global Deliverability Manager


Email: tors...@groupon.com

Groupon Inc. | www.groupon.com
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to