> If you don't like the way we handle your mail...
I never stated anything like that. I was discussing the fact that I think
it is not an effective method since it can be gamed and has quite some
I agree with your reply. I always have and always will. I just don't think
it is the appropriate response to my email.
On 6 March 2018 at 17:55, John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote:
> In article <CAKxMAXzySjFNzpHGx=Wx0hqGX4gSOVyCTK6B=2B6qT0JS03T
> j...@mail.gmail.com> you write:
> >I am against scanning everything in order to protect. Because every method
> >an ESP needs to do to "fix" these bad unsubscribes can just as easily be
> >spoofed by bad actors (e.g. redirect url to non-malicious content for
> >10 minutes). And not all ESPs are even aware of this scanning process (if
> >they are even that capable*).
> If you don't like the way we handle your mail, feel free not to send any.
> For about the gazillionth time, receiving systems deliver mail out of
> the goodness of their hearts. Smart ESPs understand that and make it
> their goal to avoid annoying the people they depend on to deliver
> their mail.
> mailop mailing list
My opinion is mine.
mailop mailing list