> On Apr 21, 2018, at 10:24, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > > In article <[email protected]> you write: >> Am I missing a case where there is a negative outcome to a legitimate, >> by-the-book sender? > > Spammer forges header with address of unrelated network, that network > gets listed even though it has never sent spam and has no relation to > the spammer.m
So don’t do that? I was specifically talking about querying a DNSBL with possible-forged IP addresses, not creating new listings or anything else. _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list [email protected] https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
