In article <bn3pr0801mb2209014d2ecf745096681108e2...@bn3pr0801mb2209.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> you write: >In our case, the uptick is due to SPF Alignment failure of the Reply-To >address.
That is definitely a candidate for Most Broken Bad Idea of the Year. No RFC even sorta kinda hints that you might ever do that. Telling the vendor to fix their broken software was the right response. _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
