Am 17.02.20 um 19:21 schrieb Alessandro Vesely via mailop:
> On Sun 16/Feb/2020 15:21:34 +0100 Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop wrote:
>> (opinionated) Don' use SPF, it's broken by design.
>
> I don't think that a FAQ starting with such opinionated entries is going 
> anywhere.
>
>
> Best
> Ale

I deliberately did not start the list with this, instead put it as the last 
point because I know opinions differ on this
topic. A public FAQ should probably not be place this into the "agreed-upon 
best practices" but the "controversial
opinions" department.

My personal experience with SPF is that it is less helpful than harmful, at 
least when mail server operators use it for
rejection instead of tagging. It can help reject some mails with fake sender 
information, but at the same time it
prevents some legitimate forwarded mails from getting through.

I do know about SRS, even had it running some time ago, and if someone wants to 
run it to improve deliverability of
forwarded mail that's perfectly fine with me.

But if you run a mail server and your users aren't getting mails forwarded from 
their accounts on other mail servers
because you reject based on SPF, you're not exactly helping deliverability.

Cheers,
Hans-Martin



_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to