Too bad - no mails to ewe for now and no response back from them. If anyone has a EWE/EWETEL contact, would be kind if one could reach out to them.
thank you. Stefan -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Jan-Philipp Benecke via mailop <[email protected]> Gesendet: Montag 9 März 2020 16:04 An: Stefan Bauer <[email protected]> CC: mailop <[email protected]> Betreff: Re: [mailop] Ewetel postmaster wanted - your IP 116.203.31.6 seems to be dynamic - please use the smarthost of your ISP Hey Stefan, we hadn't any problems with them. We wrote them about our block on 14.01. and they did respond on the same day. When did you wrote them ? Did your wrote [email protected] or did you wrote [email protected] ? Based on their answer, i think they have a internal list with dynamic ip ranges. Best, Jan-Philipp Jan-Philipp Benecke Deliverability Engineer Fon: +49 4402 97390-00 E-Mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> CleverReach GmbH & Co. KG HRA 4020 Oldenburg (Oldb.) cleverreach.de <http://www.cleverreach.com/de/> <http://www.cleverreach.com/de/> Vertreten durch: CleverReach Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 210079 Oldenburg (Oldb.) //CRASH Building | Schafjückenweg 2 | 26180 Rastede | Germany Geschäftsführung: Jens Klibingat, Sebastian Schwarz & Sebastian Strzelecki Aufsichtsrat: Rolf Hilchner & Heinz-Wilhelm Bogena Stefan Bauer via mailop schrieb am 09.03.20 um 15:03: Hi, it's just DNS round robin for our senders. did not had a sigle issue with that over the previous 2 years. Still thinking, that ewetel/ewe just uses ancient RBLs, that reports the specific IP from a dynamic-block. Stefan -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Vytis Marciulionis <[email protected]> Gesendet: Montag 9 März 2020 14:52 An: Stefan Bauer <[email protected]> CC: mailop <[email protected]> Betreff: Re: [mailop] Ewetel postmaster wanted - your IP 116.203.31.6 seems to be dynamic - please use the smarthost of your ISP Hi Stefan, This could also happen because your PTR record of sending IP address resolves with 3 IPs e: IP 116.203.31.6 - PTR securetransport.cubewerk.de - IPs 178.254.23.77; 116.203.31.6; 188.68.39.254 I know that technically it is nothing bad but, I can imagine why some sensors could return errors, especially since the 3 IP addresses are from different ASNs: I guess those 3 IPs are set as fallback in this situation? On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 11:03 AM Stefan Bauer via mailop <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: Never had delivery issues from hetzner-blocks so far (crossing fingers) but I'm aware of the past. Looks like there is at least one RBL around, that list our IP as dynamic. https://www.rbl-dns.com/bl?ip=116.203.31.6 One just have to pay to get de-listed. What a wonderful world. Stefan -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Andrew C Aitchison <[email protected]> Gesendet: Montag 9 März 2020 10:47 An: Stefan Bauer <[email protected]> CC: mailop <[email protected]> Betreff: Re: [mailop] Ewetel postmaster wanted - your IP 116.203.31.6 seems to be dynamic - please use the smarthost of your ISP On Mon, 9 Mar 2020, Stefan Bauer via mailop wrote: > Any ewetel postmaster around? One of our IPs (subject) get flagged > as dynamic during delivery to ewetel. However this IP is static. I am not surprised that Ewetel has guessed wrong: whois 116.203.31.6 -h whois.ripe.net <http://whois.ripe.net> gives a /16 belonging to our old friends Hetzner. -- Andrew C. Aitchison Kendal, UK [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop -- Pagarbiai, Vytis Marčiulionis +37064734475 _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list [email protected] https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
