Is it possible that a complaint that a postmaster's note about what he thinks his users like can't be trusted because it lacks a scientifically rigorous study might possibly be off topic for an operational considerations list? Asking for a friend.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:44 AM Dave Crocker via mailop <mailop@mailop.org> wrote: > > On 7/27/2020 7:59 AM, Marcel Becker via mailop wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 3:55 AM Dave Crocker <d...@dcrocker.net > > <mailto:d...@dcrocker.net>> wrote: > > > >> > >> My quote above did not claim that. I explained why we participate > > in BIMI. > > > > Perhaps you have data to support a claim of differential user > > behavior? > > > > > > I am not sure you read what I wrote. > > > Ahh, I see my query was too mild and too superficial. I am guessing > that you think your speaking from authority: > > On 7/22/2020 3:45 PM, Marcel Becker via mailop wrote: > > However the majority of our users prefer meaningful avatars and > > brand logos in their email experience as it helps them identify email > > senders and it helps with them with triaging. > > makes my query redundant, but of course my query wasn't for your > reassuring conclusion but for the sharing of research data that allows > others to evaluate the methodology and the results on their own. > > d/ > -- > Dave Crocker > Brandenburg InternetWorking > bbiw.net > > -- > Dave Crocker > Brandenburg InternetWorking > bbiw.net > > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop -- Al Iverson // Wombatmail // Chicago Song a day! https://www.wombatmail.com Deliverability! https://spamresource.com And DNS Tools too! https://xnnd.com _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
