Moin
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 01:57:54PM -0800, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
> No, Pipeline is not advertised, the RFC's say that when you send a command,
> if you are NOT using pipelining, you need to wait for a response, and that
> includes the QUIT.. wait for the receiving system to send an OK in this
> respect, not only does it satisfy RFC's but also helps differentiate from
> the many spamming systems that terminate as quickly as they can to reduce
> overhead when spamming.
Where did you find a pre-historic SMTP server without PIPELINING?
Also RFC 5321 sounds quite clear to me:
| The sender MUST NOT intentionally close the transmission channel until
| it sends a QUIT command, and it SHOULD wait until it receives the reply
| (even if there was an error response to a previous command).
So the wait for QUIT reply is a SHOULD.
Bastian
--
Peace was the way.
-- Kirk, "The City on the Edge of Forever", stardate unknown
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
