On 12/18/2021, Larry M. Smith via mailop wrote:
On 12/18/2021, yuv via mailop wrote:
(snip)
Their FAQ is up at <https://privacystudy.cs.princeton.edu/> and it all
looks like a lawyers-approved shield to try to justify what they have
done. They know they have pushed too far. The question is whether
they will learn from this and whether the learning will flow into a
fairer IRB. I will follow up with Jonathan.
I find this bit interesting;
Heh, I also note the following addition to the HTML;
<meta http-equiv="Cache-Control" content="private, no-store" />
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
