On 10/18/22 8:28 AM, WIlliam Fisher via mailop wrote:
I'm pretty sure DKIM wouldn't include the non-standard threading headers.
/Default/ DKIM configurations probably don't include the threading header(s) (References & In-Reply-To). But it's certainly possible that they are included.
That being said, I see that both References: and In-Reply-To: are included in the DKIM-Signature: of the message that I'm replying to.
I've re-wrapped it to make it easier to read.
DKIM-Signature:
v=1;
a=rsa-sha256;
bh=2HJH0z8OPqiZSksYlT5t9QkCZyw3VikRfFdD5Blq7oU=;
c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=earthlink.net;
h=from:
reply-to:
subject:
date:
to:
cc:
resent-date:
resent-from:
resent-to:
resent-cc:
in-reply-to:
references:
list-id:
list-help:
list-unsubscribe:
list-subscribe:
list-post:
list-owner:
list-archive;
q=dns/txt;
s=dk12062016;
t=1666103332;x=1666708132;
b=QSe+qudK+EvZiTVCfIIyY1ZZVBmtwmw1sEI1OSB0BRPEpgwr/IM41U43QjJNOOmku5a328ciBXHw1g3ncgL69gfnBrkXSAgcxavl6uQL7J2/3AbNe5w0Kj29w7mZpSPa/8YNMp8KkTaGCrN54EUWys2Zglz0a1EocvpRg3JjeJ99l66dKGxj0EJN7G/akyw26EXdjbbTy7OrNvVQn5z1vaFtLFZtsgmAAJRTsHRspoyaSlnAom7R5vBIUrd5ILqHKcrDpWV9KjsYmLl+pRv3dU57RaEt8VGrATwkfAbyJmTnF3uKNuM03K73NQ9ewWjIgkDhep3RRLesdgjPdrb0iA==
Including the resent-* headers is interesting to me, seeing as how they
aren't included in the message. I don't know if this was an intentional
over-sign or over zealous configuration.
-- Grant. . . . unix || die
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
