Matus UHLAR - fantomas via mailop skrev den 2024-02-13 16:00:
I still think implementing SPF and SRS gives more value than ARC.
On 13.02.24 16:17, Benny Pedersen via mailop wrote:
oh dear, if you really need both spf and srs, your problem is more
deep then linux
OP stated they already do SRS, which is here to make SPF work (better).
There are reportedly still servers rejecting SPF fail, which you'll get when
you forward without SRS.
ARC may help the sender later, SPF/SRS will immediately.
begin trust maillists domains in arc, get better stable results on spf
dkim arc dmarc
for non maillist, dont trust arc
We've had this discussion already.
When you talk about me manually trusting ARC from senders I personally use,
or from the list I posted in my last mail
- that's the whole point.
But we are here talking about server-side of issues, correct?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email protected] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Due to unexpected conditions Windows 2000 will be released
in first quarter of year 1901
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
