On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 09:16:47PM +0200, Tobias Fiebig via mailop wrote: ... > Ah, no, judging from the NDR, in this case, it is the urldefense > feature breaking DKIM. ... > Then again, I need to get a (somewhat-ish) important email delivered, > and the sensible option you outlined (make the tenant fix their > settings) is not really feasible;
Maybe avoid putting URLs into the message? Then there will be no URLs for UD to rewrite (and assuming no warning tags, etc) then DKIM will remain valid. Should at least be good enough to explain to someone there that they need to fix their settings. PG (disclaimer: works for PP, but not in the pp-hosted side) _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list [email protected] https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
