Dnia 23.06.2025 o godz. 23:54:57 Matt Palmer via mailop pisze:
> What a nonsense! Why they check DMARC at all if they require *both* SPF
> *and* DKIM to pass?
Because DMARC, SPF, and DKIM are different things, that assert different
properties of the email, and thus may have different values to the
receiving site's policy.
On 24.06.25 03:11, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
DMARC is basically SPF *or* DKIM (plus "From:" header alignment), so if they
want both SPF *and* DKIM to pass, DMARC seems redundant to me.
it still makes sense to use DMARC for reports, but for rejection in such
case it's superflous.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Silvester Stallone: Father of the RISC concept.
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
