Moin,

> Are you aware, that this can be considered as abuse by legitimate
> other sides, if used without agreement? And once decided that, you
> can be blocked, and thus your results can be false positive? IMO it
> doesn't matter how often you will send that test report...

I do not really see how 'sending a DMARC report to a published RUA/RUF'
would be considered abuse?

Also, the report does not contain any deliveries, i.e., should not
register, and is sent max. once per two weeks.

I was pondering to include any information in the report, but that,
instead, might actually add (incorrect) data to somebodies DMARC
reports. So, I opted for the empty report.

If I overlooked something, please let me know.

> And second, undeliverable rua can be just mistake in config or misuse
> of gmail (or so) ratelimited mailbox, as is in many of my cases
> (legitimate domains/mails).

Yes. Still filling my mailq. That is why destinations are regularly
rechecked.

> BTW, rspamd supports maps in dmarc_report module (exclusion), while
> i use only static file DB for that, it should be configured by map
> type prefix, eg redis or regex, in recent versions.

Yes, it does. It does not, however, support external_map maps for the
DMARC plugin. So, technically, the static export already does work.
However, that does not automatically add new domains.

With best regards,
Tobias

-- 
Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig
T +31 616 80 98 99
M [email protected]
Pronouns: he/him/his
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to