Hi,

On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 12:43:29PM +0100, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
> As I have already stated previously, if the receiver has not enough staff to
> perform such manual analysis, the should hire more staff. If they insist
> they cannot affors to hire more staff, they should go out of email business
> and do something else. Period.

Their users prefer the current setup where they don't pay anything and
gmail remains in business, with its current spam detection and false
positive rate. So once we have exhausted market forces as a way to
influence inbox provider behaviour, I guess we are left only with
legal/regulatory pressure, because you clearly will not get any trade
association to ask its members to be hostile to their own users.

I am not at all sure that I want to agree that how any organisation
classifies and manages its inbound email should be the purview of
governments (outside of extremely narrow criteria). But that whole
conversation would I think at the very least be ineffective, and quite
possibly off-topic, to have here.

Thanks,
Andy

-- 
https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to