> Well, that would help, maybe unless they think of some other annoying > way to obscure. > > The only problem is, that their hostnames are somewhat random and > unguessable.
They all end in *.outlook.com. > By the way, exim, as it is the only one with that flexibility. > > > BTW, SPF is not and never was meant as an anti-spam measure, and has > > virtually nothing in common with spam checking. The most notorious and > > active spammers have usually SPF, DKIM and DMARC configured perfectly fine. > > I know, I know. However, it still prevents some random bots from > delivering there crap. Yeah, but you can't complain when you try to eat soup with a fork and it makes a mess. SPF checks the last hop (only); it was never compatible with forwarding. And SRS is not broadly considered a standard nor is it implemented everywhere. Cheers, Al Iverson -- Al Iverson // 312-725-0130 // Chicago http://www.spamresource.com // Deliverability http://www.aliverson.com // All about me https://xnnd.com/calendar // Book my calendar _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list [email protected] https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
