Got it. Then the paradigm of the EUQ shouldn't be sending anything to external 
parties. The ESA works generally as a MX and the SMA hosts the quarantines 
which is internal in most cases. The EUQ keeps messages that have been 
quarantined and sends a notification if configured to do so. 



That, usually is the expected configuration but there can be a particular case 
where inside and outside may change depending on in and out perception. Since 
this seems (given the domains involved) is the Cloud Email Security Service. In 
this case, it depends on the customer whether it is managed (by Cisco) or self 
service managed by the customer. 



ces.cisco.com is the subdomain Cisco used for everything Cloud Email Service 
while smtpi.com is basically the domain they use to align their IP address 
forward and reverse resolution as a canonical domain. Re-reading the mail, I 
totally agree with you. Seems a customer who has little or no experience and 
even worse mixed up default email addresses ( mailto:[email protected] ) 
which is the one they use for managed services and serves as a palceholder on 
pre-configured fields when it is customer managed. That doesn't look like a 
potential bug being exploited. In principle the SMA assigne dor a customer 
usually should relay on the ESA although they have the capability to deliver 
email directly to the internet if firewalls enable it. I am not sure right now 
if they allow this or users should relay their SMA traffic via their ESA. 







From: Graeme Fowler via mailop <[email protected]>
To: "mailop"<[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2026 20:46:05 -0400
Subject: Re: [mailop] Cisco Ironport asking RECIPIENT if their customer is 
sending spam?



On 1 Jun 2026, at 18:21, J. Enrique Díaz Jolly via mailop < 
mailto:[email protected] > wrote:
> If I understood your mail

I don’t think you did. Unless I am very much mistaken, Benoit is logically 
*outside* the specific Ironport systems, which is why this is worthy of 
inspection.

It is, most likely, a naive or inexperienced Cisco Ironport customer - or it’s 
a vulnerabilty being exploited. I very much suspect the former.

Graeme
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailto:[email protected] 
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
Please report any mail abuse or violation to 
abuse(at)jolly(dash)security(dot)tech.

_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to