Ed/Ray/FD.io Community:

I haven’t been directly involved in this discussion.  But my observations are 
that there is an effort in FD.io to improve some of the content and 
documentation (which is always commendable) but also some level of frustration 
with how to get that content updated and published on the website and/or wiki 
pages.

My past experience both here and in other projects has me conclude:
- Use a marketing team for the “pretty” public facing content. This would be 
all the fd.io facing material.  FD.io has a marketing committee that should own 
and drive that effort.  They should also be working with the broader LFN 
marketing advisory committee for support, ideas, etc.
- Use the technical community for technical content that predominantly shows up 
on the wiki, developer targeted pages.  If req’d the FD.io TSC could ask the 
LFN TAC for help (though I don’t suspect that’s needed.)

I don’t know why we’d ever want to get the communities technical experts 
working on non-wiki tech pages.  And if there’s some gaps wrt support from the 
marketing team then perhaps the topic should be brought up there and addressed 
head-on.

Hope this perspective helps a bit. Let me know what “we already tried that” or 
other barriers exist. Then let’s get the right folks to step up, own them, and 
resolve them. Our tech experts can then focus on creating the best technical 
documentation and not worry about website layout, etc.

Jim

P.S. I’d join the discussion tomorrow, but I’ll be in a plane.

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Edward Warnicke
Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2019 11:00 AM
To: Kinsella, Ray <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [FD.io] Community management of main fd.io website

Totally.  There was some discussion after you left about whether to take a vote 
or wait a week.  The consensus was that you had seemed very supportive, and so 
we felt comfortable proceeding.
Our intention was not to preclude any further discussion you think might be 
productive.  Lets talk about it tomorrow :)

Ed

On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 12:13 PM Kinsella, Ray 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Ed,

Looks like this vote occurred after I left the call, so I missed it.

I very much want to commend the work that John DeNisco in particular has done 
here, it is really impressive.
John has been working tirelessly on the FD.io documentation and the website 
since this time last year, he deserves a lot of recognition for this.

However I think this bears a little further discussion at the TSC.
For instance, I understand that this will make technical contributors such as 
PTL’s lives easier.
I am 100% on that page, however do we have input from the FD.io marketing 
committee on the change?
What happens to Linux Foundation marketing support after this change is made?

Could we schedule it as an agenda item tomorrow?

Thanks,

Ray K

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Edward Warnicke
Sent: Thursday 30 May 2019 18:04
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [FD.io] Community management of main fd.io<http://fd.io> website

In todays FD.io TSC meeting, the TSC voted to take steps to allow the FD.io 
community to manage the main fd.io<http://fd.io/> website.

As part of the discussion, John DeNisco showed off a 
Github+Hugo<https://gohugo.io/>+Netlify<https://www.netlify.com/> version of 
the fd.io<http://fd.io/> site, which you can see here:

https://myfdio.netlify.com/

It is driven by PRs to a github repo.  The repo for the above demo is:

https://github.com/jadenisco/fdiomain if you want to take a look at how it 
works.

We will be moving this to fdio/site in Github as part of this process.

Anyone can push a PR to alter the website 
(example<https://github.com/jadenisco/fdiomain/pull/16>).  The PRs generate 
preview site that can be examined prior to merge.  Deployment of merged content 
to the main site is automatic.

The other thing the TSC decided today was to ask the PTL of each project to 
propose 1-2 representatives to get access to review site changes in Github and 
have access to the Netlify org.

So PTLs, please respond to this email indicating your nominees for those roles. 
 Please cc them so I have emails to use to invite them to various things.  
Bonus points if you can include their Github ids :)

In particular there is a place for each project to list content about 
themselves here:

https://myfdio.netlify.com/projects/

There are some mockups for vpp and CSIT, we would like all active projects to 
provide content.


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13): https://lists.fd.io/g/main/message/13
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/31870906/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/main/leave/1479837/1967881053/xyzzy  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to