On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 11:57:03AM +0530, Kaushal M wrote: > Should we have a smoke check that marks a change with `rfc` as the > topic '-1 (something)'? This would prevent such changes from being > merged.
We could, but I hope we do not need it. But if others think it would be the best approach, we can change it. Niels > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Niels de Vos <nde...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > last week I've seen that some patches got merged that have their Gerrit > > topic set to 'rfc'. I would really like to have all changes that touch > > code (maybe not like updates to the MAINTAINERS file) linked to a bug. > > For features, we used a tracker bug that gathered all patches. Could we > > pick that up again for NSR/FDL/DHT2 and others that modify the contents > > under xlators/experimental/ ? > > > > Without a bug, it is very difficult to build a Gerrit query that lists > > all changes for a particular feature. Searching for "topic:rfc" is not > > very useful :-/ > > > > Thanks, > > Niels > > > > _______________________________________________ > > maintainers mailing list > > maintainers@gluster.org > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > >
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers