On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" <[email protected]> >> To: "Kaushal M" <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected] >> Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 10:16:52 AM >> Subject: Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainers acks needed for 3.7.12 >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" <[email protected]> >> > To: "Kaushal M" <[email protected]> >> > Cc: [email protected] >> > Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2016 10:10:22 AM >> > Subject: Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] Maintainers acks needed for 3.7.12 >> > >> > >> > >> > ----- Original Message ----- >> > > From: "Kaushal M" <[email protected]> >> > > To: [email protected], "Vijay Bellur" <[email protected]> >> > > Cc: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <[email protected]>, "Raghavendra >> > > Gowdappa" >> > > <[email protected]>, "Xavier Hernandez" >> > > <[email protected]> >> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 7:07:56 PM >> > > Subject: Re: Maintainers acks needed for 3.7.12 >> > > >> > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Kaushal M <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > Hi all, >> > > > >> > > > If anyone doesn't know about it yet, the release process for a release >> > > > has changed. Refer to the mail thread [1] for more information. >> > > > >> > > > tl;dr, component maintainers need to now provide an acknowledgement >> > > > that their component is ready to the release manager, for the manager >> > > > to make the release. The maintainers are expected to test their >> > > > components and make sure that it is not obviously broken. In the >> > > > future, we expect to make this testing automated, which will require >> > > > maintainers to provide these tests (using DiSTAF). >> > > > >> > > > Vijay, who's managing 3.7.12, sent out a call for acks [2], which >> > > > hasn't recieved any acks apart from the Atin for GlusterD. It is >> > > > possible that most of you missed this as it was part of another >> > > > thread. >> > > > >> > > > I'm starting this thread as the official call for acks, so that it is >> > > > more visible to all developers. I cc'd component maintainers (from >> > > > MAINTAINERS) to make sure no one misses this. >> > > > >> > > > Use the tag v3.7.12rc1 to verify your components and provide your acks >> > > > by replying to this thread. >> > > >> > > I'll be doing the release on behalf of Vijay. >> > > I had hoped to do the release right now (22-Jun-2016 UTC 1330), but >> > > I'm postponing it to tomorrow, to give my hurting hand some rest. >> > > >> > > This gives maintainers a little more time to provide the missing ACKs. >> > > >> > > ACKs have been obtained for GlusterD, Geo-Rep, Snapshots, Tiering, >> > > NFS, transports(tcp,rdma). >> > > >> > > Quota has an iffy ACK, as 2 more changes have been requested for >> > > merging, but they don't have proper all the flags to be merged yet. >> > > The ACK doesn't say if these 2 changes were included. >> > > >> > > Major components yet to recieve ACKs are AFR, DHT and EC. >> >> Thanks to QE from Redhat, specifically "Krishnaram Karthick Ramdoss" >> <[email protected]> and "Anil Shah" <[email protected]>, we have some >> sanity tests being run on Quota and DHT (including the list of patches which >> I compiled). Once the tests are complete, I'll let you know the results. > > DHT tests have passed. DHT rebalance tests are still running. The update is > that it will take 12+ hours for the tests to complete. >
Any update on this? >> >> > > >> > > DHT also has a couple of changes that were requested for merging. I've >> > > merged one, the other doesn't have all the flags. >> > >> > Sorry for being illiterate on the flags. What are the flags needed? I can >> > try >> > to get them. The reviews were missing Core-Review+2's. >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > ~kaushal >> > > >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > Kaushal >> > > > >> > > > [1] >> > > > https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/maintainers/2016-April/000679.html >> > > > [2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/maintainers/2016-June/000847.html >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > maintainers mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers >> > _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
