Thanks for the reminder. Just merged it. Mostly the release will happen today.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Kaushal M <[email protected]> wrote: > Pranith, > > This change [1] removing experimental xlators isn't merged yet. It > should be taken in before you do your release. > > [1]: https://review.gluster.org/15750 > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Niels de Vos <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 04:52:29PM -0500, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > >> On 11/10/2016 04:12 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > >> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Niels de Vos <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > The packages from the CentOS Storage SIG will by default provide the > >> > > latest LTM release. The STM release is provided in addition, and > needs > >> > > an extra step to enable. > >> > > > >> > > I am not sure how we can handle this in other distributions (or also > >> > > with the packages on d.g.o.). > >> > > >> > Maybe we should not flip the LATEST for non-RPM distributions in > >> > d.g.o? or should we introduce LTM/LATEST and encourage users to change > >> > their repository files to point to this? > >> > >> I like having LATEST and LTM symlinks, but--- > >> > >> Did we decide that after 3.8 the next LTM release will be 3.10? (Or 4.0 > >> whenever that lands?) And an LTM release is maintained for 12 or 18 > months? > >> > >> If so there probably will be two active LTM releases, assuming we can > ship > >> the next releases on time. > > > > Yes, and we have is documented (with diagrams!) on > > https://www.gluster.org/community/release-schedule/ , see the "Post-3.8" > > section. > > > >> We should have LTM-3.8 and eventually LTM-3.10 symlinks then. Or are > there > >> other ideas? > >> > >> > Packaging in distributions would be handled by package maintainers and > >> > I presume they can decide the appropriateness of a release for > >> > packaging? > >> > >> Indeed. Well, that's the status quo, and beyond our control in any > event. > > > > We should probably send out a reminder to the packaging list as that > > should contain all known packagers for different distributions. > > Including 3.9 in a distribution might be appropriate for some, as long > > as the distribution/version goes EOL before our STM release. > > > > Niels > > > > _______________________________________________ > > maintainers mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > > > -- Pranith
_______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
