On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 07:30:40AM -0500, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > In all this please keep in mind that Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu, and SuSE > all have python-jwt and all have this functionality, and the CentOS > packages will not be a (feature) parity with the other 3.12.3 packages > if the python-jwt changes are reverted for CentOS.
Indeed, and that is one of the main reasons to provide an update in case an alternative backport is available before 3.12.4. Niels > > > > On 11/22/2017 04:36 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:38:32AM +0530, Aravinda wrote: > >> On Tuesday 21 November 2017 08:29 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > >>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:06:59AM +0530, Aravinda wrote: > >>>> Hi Niels, > >>>> > >>>> I over looked the email about 3.12.3 release. > >>>> > >>>> Please suggest what we can do for this package dependency. This is > >>>> runtime > >>>> dependency for one of the sub feature, if it is delaying other things > >>>> then > >>>> we can remove this dependency from spec file.(All features work except > >>>> signing the webhook data). > >>> Hmm, normally new features do not get backported to prevent unforseen > >>> problems... > >>> > >>> We have been delayed quite a bit already, users are asking for the > >>> packages. If dropping the dependency from the .spec does not result in > >>> errors or tracebacks, that would be one approach. Can you please confirm > >>> that there are no problems when the package is missing? > >> Without the dependency, BZ 1501864 will not work. I will start working on > >> the alternate approach without using that library. We can remove from > >> dependency list now. > >> > >> @Sahina, Is it possible to wait for this feature till 3.12.4 release? > > > > Many thanks Aravinda! I've spoken with Jiffin (one of the 3.12 release > > managers) about this as well now. I will revert the change in the > > packaging for the CentOS Storage SIG, both the code and the dependency. > > > > If a good alternative comes up, and the feature is critical to be in > > 3.12, we can do an update of the RPMs or wait for 3.12.4+. > > > > Niels > > > > > >>> If there is, we'll just bite the bullet and include python-jws-1.5 in > >>> the CentOS Storage SIG while keeping an eye on the Fedora package for > >>> updates. Additional maintainers for this and other packages are much > >>> wanted. > >>> > >>> Niels > >>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Monday 20 November 2017 09:59 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > >>>>> Hi Aravinda, > >>>>> > >>>>> A reply on the questions below is still outstanding. At the moment, I > >>>>> tend to think that using the most recent python-jwt package from Fedora > >>>>> is the most reasonable approach. It is a little more maintained there, > >>>>> and the CentOS Storage SIG can then piggy-back on the coming bugfixes > >>>>> and updates. > >>>>> > >>>>> Is there someone who wants to maintain/assist with watching over > >>>>> python-jwt for the CentOS Storage SIG? > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> Niels > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 01:22:52PM +0100, Niels de Vos wrote: > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:39:46AM +0000, [email protected] > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> SRC: > >>>>>>> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/21/artifact/glusterfs-3.12.3.tar.gz > >>>>>>> HASH: > >>>>>>> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/21/artifact/glusterfs-3.12.3.sha256sum > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> This release is made off jenkins-release-21 > >>>>>> This release adds an additional dependency for the glusterfs-events > >>>>>> sub-package (https://review.gluster.org/18519). There is no python-jwt > >>>>>> in RHEL/CentOS-7 so, we'll need to ship (and maintain!) this new > >>>>>> package > >>>>>> in the CentOS Storage SIG. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Will python-jwt become part of RHEL at one point? Which version will be > >>>>>> included in that case? I would prefer not to have to maintain > >>>>>> python-jwt > >>>>>> longer than necessary, and when RHEL-7 ships this package, it should > >>>>>> ideally update the version I need to add to the Storage SIG. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [Obviously this delays packaging the update for CentOS.] > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> Niels > >>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>> packaging mailing list > >>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> regards > >>>> Aravinda VK > >>>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> regards > >> Aravinda VK > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > packaging mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging > > > > -- > > Kaleb _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
