On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 7:46 PM, Shyam Ranganathan <srang...@redhat.com>
wrote:

> On 01/30/2018 02:14 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As release 3.10.10 is tagged and off to packaging, here are the needed
> > details for 3.10.11
> >
> > Release date: 28th Feb, 2018
>
> Checking the 3.10 review backlog, here are a couple of concerns,
>
> 1) Reviews,
>   - https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19081/
>   - https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19082/
>
> Have been submitted since Jan 9th, but are not passing regressions or
> smoke. I rebased them again today, but they still fail.
>
> @Du, can you look at these, as you have backported them.
>
> 2) @Hari, https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19553/ seems to be failing
> consistently in the test, ./tests/bugs/posix/bug-990028.t please take a
> look, as this patch is important from an upgrade perspective.
>

atin@dhcp35-96:~/codebase/upstream/glusterfs_master/glusterfs$ git log
tests/bugs/posix/bug-990028.t
commit 858fae39936e5aee5ea4e3816a10ba310d04cf61
Author: Amar Tumballi <ama...@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon Nov 27 23:56:50 2017 +0530

    tests: mark currently failing regression tests as known issues

    Change-Id: If6c36dc6c395730dfb17b5b4df6f24629d904926
    BUG: 1517961
    Signed-off-by: Amar Tumballi <ama...@redhat.com>

FWIW, this test is marked as bad in master.  Should we mark it bad in
release-3.12 as well?


> > Tracker bug for blockers:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=glusterfs-3.10.11
> >
> > Shyam
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > gluster-de...@gluster.org
> > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >
> _______________________________________________
> maintainers mailing list
> maintainers@gluster.org
> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
>
_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Reply via email to