On 08/09/2018 10:58 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote:
> 
> 
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 1:38 AM, Shyam Ranganathan <srang...@redhat.com
> <mailto:srang...@redhat.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 08/08/2018 09:04 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
>     > Today's patch set 7 [1], included fixes provided till last evening IST,
>     > and its runs can be seen here [2] (yay! we can link to comments in
>     > gerrit now).
>     > 
>     > New failures: (added to the spreadsheet)
>     > ./tests/bugs/quick-read/bug-846240.t
> 
>     The above test fails always if there is a sleep of 10 added at line 36.
> 
>     I tried to replicate this in my setup, and was able to do so 3/150 times
>     and the failures were the same as the ones reported in the build logs
>     (as below).
> 
>     Not finding any clear reason for the failure, I delayed the test (i.e
>     added a sleep 10) after the open on M0 to see if the race is uncovered,
>     and it was.
> 
>     Du, request you to take a look at the same, as the test is around
>     quick-read but involves open-behind as well.
> 
> 
> Thanks for that information. I'll be working on this today.

Heads up Du, failed again with the same pattern in run
https://build.gluster.org/job/regression-on-demand-full-run/46/consoleFull

> 
> 
>     Failure snippet:
>     ----------------
>     23:41:24 [23:41:28] Running tests in file
>     ./tests/bugs/quick-read/bug-846240.t
>     23:41:28 ./tests/bugs/quick-read/bug-846240.t ..
>     23:41:28 1..17
>     23:41:28 ok 1, LINENUM:9
>     23:41:28 ok 2, LINENUM:10
>     <snip>
>     23:41:28 ok 13, LINENUM:40
>     23:41:28 not ok 14 , LINENUM:50
>     23:41:28 FAILED COMMAND: [ 0 -ne 0 ]
> 
>     Shyam
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
maintainers@gluster.org
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers

Reply via email to