On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:18 PM Shyam Ranganathan <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 3/4/19 7:29 AM, Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan wrote: > > Thanks for testing this Hari. > > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 5:42 PM Hari Gowtham <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > With the patch https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/21838/ the > > upgrade from 3.12 to 6, 4.1 to 6 and 5 to 6 is broken. > > > > The above patch is available in release 6 and has been back-ported > > to 4.1 and 5. > > Though there isn't any release made with this patch on 4.1 and 5, if > > made there are a number of scenarios that will fail. Few are mentioned > > below: > > > > > > Considering there is no release with this patch in, lets not consider > > backporting at all.
It has been back-ported to 4 and 5 already. Regarding 5 we have decided to revert and make the release. Are we going to revert the patch for 4 or wait for the fix? > > Current 5.4 release (yet to be announced and released on the CentOS SIG > (as testing is pending) *has* the fix. We need to revert it and rebuild > 5.4, so that we can make the 5.4 release (without the fix). > > Hari/Sanju are you folks already on it? Yes, Sanju is working on the patch. > > Shyam -- Regards, Hari Gowtham. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
