On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 08:43:38AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > The Version tag should be (considered) immutable. Please don't move it. > > If you want to add another tag to help us remember this issue that's fine. > > The other option which Shyam and I discussed was tagging v5.5.
v5.5 or a v5.4.1 would have my preference. That also makes it clear for packagers that build packages for other distributions and the users that build from the source tarball. Niels > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 8:32 AM Amar Tumballi Suryanarayan < > atumb...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > We need to tag different commit may be? So the 'git checkout v5.4' points > > to the correct commit? > > > > On Wed, 13 Mar, 2019, 4:40 PM Shyam Ranganathan, <srang...@redhat.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Niels, Kaleb, > >> > >> We need to respin 5.4 with the 2 additional commits as follows, > >> > >> commit a00953ed212a7071b152c4afccd35b92fa5a682a (HEAD -> release-5, > >> core: make compute_cksum function op_version compatible > >> > >> commit 8fb4631c65f28dd0a5e0304386efff3c807e64a4 > >> dict: handle STR_OLD data type in xdr conversions > >> > >> As the current build breaks rolling upgrades, we had held back on > >> announcing 5.4 and are now ready with the fixes that can be used to > >> respin 5.4. > >> > >> Let me know if I need to do anything more from my end for help with the > >> packaging. > >> > >> Once the build is ready, we would be testing it out as usual. > >> > >> NOTE: As some users have picked up 5.4 the announce would also carry a > >> notice, that they need to do a downserver upgrade to the latest bits > >> owing to the patches that have landed in addition to the existing content. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Shyam > >> > >> On 3/5/19 8:59 AM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > >> > On 2/27/19 5:19 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > >> >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:47:30PM +0000, jenk...@build.gluster.org > >> wrote: > >> >>> SRC: > >> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.tar.gz > >> >>> HASH: > >> https://build.gluster.org/job/release-new/80/artifact/glusterfs-5.4.sha512sum > >> >> > >> >> Packages for the CentOS Storage SIG are now available for testing. > >> >> Please try them out and report test results on this list. > >> >> > >> >> # yum install centos-release-gluster > >> >> # yum install --enablerepo=centos-gluster5-test glusterfs-server > >> > > >> > Due to patch [1] upgrades are broken, so we are awaiting a fix or revert > >> > of the same before requesting a new build of 5.4. > >> > > >> > The current RPMs should hence not be published. > >> > > >> > Sanju/Hari, are we reverting this patch so that we can release 5.4, or > >> > are we expecting the fix to land in 5.4 (as in [2])? > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Shyam > >> > > >> > [1] Patch causing regression: > >> https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22148 > >> > > >> > [2] Proposed fix on master: > >> https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/22297/ > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > maintainers mailing list > >> > maintainers@gluster.org > >> > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> maintainers mailing list > >> maintainers@gluster.org > >> https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > maintainers mailing list > > maintainers@gluster.org > > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers > > > _______________________________________________ > packaging mailing list > packag...@gluster.org > https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list maintainers@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers