Hi Amar, the changes seem ok to me.
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 11:25 AM Amar Tumballi <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > It is been 28 months since we last committed our major changes to > MAINTAINERS file. Lot of waters have flown in all the rivers since then. > New people joined, and some people left to find more interesting projects > from Gluster Project. > > In my opinion, we surely should be having a practice of reviewing our > maintainer list for successful progress of project. It should reflect the > recent active contributors in the list, and ideally (if you compare to any > other active projects), we should be reviewing the list *every year*. But > 2 years is not a bad thing considering the time we took to change things > for v2.0 (from v1.0). > > I am attaching the proposed patch (can be broken into different patches > per component if one wants). I am planning to send this to review next week > with everyone of the maintainers (everyone whose name shifts places). But I > thought letting the Maintainers know about this through email first is a > good idea. > > Feel free to agree, disagree or ignore. Please make sure you have reasons > why some changes are not valid. Please open the patch, where I have tried > to capture details too. > > Would be great if we close on this soon. I say lets time box it to 15 > days, for everyone to raise objections, if any. After which, it would get > merged (15 days from the date of submission of patch). > > Regards, > Amar >
_______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
