On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 09:09:37PM +0100, Trygve Laugstøl wrote: > > My idea was to use the data to prioritize our work for those who want to > contribute to the project as a "whole" and help out with getting > packages for the most popular packages.
In some ways, seems like that is non-productive at the start. Wouldnt the "most popular packages" naturally get the most help anyway? Contrariwise, the ones that "need the most help", might be the ones that no-one uses, becuase they are too out of date for people to use any more. I think Dagobert's buglist would probably be the most targetted way to identify "packages that need the most help.". And then there's stuff like samba. sigh. I made a gigantic test package a while back, and put it in testing. but have had zero feedback. Since I dont use samba myself, I really need SOMEONE to give me feedback about it before I put more work into splitting it up n stuff. (or, someone else is very welcome to take it over and I'll give them what notes I have) _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
