Hi,
sorry for the repost, now with corrected pathes. Please ignore previous
posting.
Best regards
-- Dago
Am 28.11.2008 um 12:12 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen:
Hi!
(sorry for the HTML mail, but otherwise the long lines are broken).
Am 18.11.2008 um 07:51 schrieb Trygve Laugstøl:
I agree with Phil here, we need two packages. I would never use JDK
or
JRE package that has been modified by upstream packages, just see the
just that Debian tries deliver with their "java" packages.
I am currently looking into the JDK/JRE issue. The idea is
to have a CSWjre6 package containing the JRE and a CSWjdk6
package, which depends on CSWjre6 and adds the JDK.
So, the layout will look like this:
/opt/csw/java/jdk/latest links to jdk6 (or jdk7 later) CSWjdk
(depends on CSWjdk6)
/opt/csw/java/jdk/jdk6 links to jdk1.6.0_07 (or _08 later)
CSWjdk6
/opt/csw/java/jdk/jdk1.6.0_07 contains stuff from archive
CSWjdk6
/opt/csw/java/jdk/jdk1.6.0_07/jre contains JRE inside JDK
CSWjre6
/opt/csw/java/jre/jdk1.6.0_07/jre/man links to ../man
CSWjre6
/opt/csw/java/jre/latest links to jre6 CSWjre (depends on
CSWjre6)
/opt/csw/java/jre/jre6 links to jre1.6.0_07
CSWjre6
/opt/csw/java/jre/jre1.6.0_07 links to jdk1.6.0_07/jre
CSWjre6
/opt/csw/java/man links to jdk/latest/man
CSWjre
I compared the JRE embedded in the JDK. The following files
are only in jdk1.6.0_07/jre:
lib/sparc/libsaproc.so
lib/sparcv9/libsaproc.so
lib/sparc/libattach.so
lib/sparcv9/libattach.so
What are these for? Just take the JRE from the JDK add them to the
CSWjre6?
When the permit from Sun arrives I'll give the package
a final shot.
Best regards
-- Dago
_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
