On 27/11/08, 21:28:12, Dagobert Michelsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding Re: [csw-maintainers] BO Buildfarm will be down due to migration:
> James: Please repeat your benchmark, and the clock should now be > running in sync too. Rerun with local storage on each machine, this is a fairer test of the machines - although the previous was a fair test of those particular installations. pandora V240 2 x 1500MHz US3i: real 7:09.894 user 0.015 sys 0.033 (showing good repeatability, previous was 7:09.891) build8s T5220 32 x 1165MHz UltraSPARC T2: real 10:18.513 user 39:59.926 sys 8:12.902 Extracting elements of build we see the differences, real times: Task US3i T2 ./configure 59 2:54 gmake -j $NCPU 4:46 3:01 gmake -j 16 - 3:03 gmake -j 8 - 3:30 gmake -j 4 - 6:09 Conclusion, the T2 has more overall power but is unable to utilise it as the overall build process is not parallel enough (disclaimer, in this case...). We should see benefits when several people are working concurrently. James. _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
