On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Dagobert Michelsen <[email protected]> wrote: >> Dago? I assume the above wouldn't be hard for you to implement? :-) >> Would keep n00bs like me from getting a headache with the prototype >> filter. :-) > > No problem. I would go one step further and integrate user- and > group addition directly into GAR. The default class would then > be 'none' in the usual case and 'autouser' if special classes > are used. I do some thinking and you do some thinking and we'll > see how we do this best.
I don't want to keep you from thinking but I wasn't thinking when I wrote the above. :-) -- /peter _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
