Hi,
Am 16.03.2009 um 22:16 schrieb Joerg Schilling:
Mike Watters <[email protected]> wrote:
patches and scripts can be either GPL v2 or v3 or later, their
Choice "I believe."
whereas if the license for the base is GPL v3 then the maintainer's
additions must be GPL v3 or later.
any source code patch would fall under the license of the original
source "I think"
The makefiles in question are not part of "the work" but only part
of "the
complete source" (which is more than "the work"). For any part that
is beyond
"the work", there is no license requirement in the GPL.
About the "Core GAR" there is no doubt: It was released under GPLv2
and I'm comfortable with sticking my mGAR v2 stuff under it.
Personally, I like the idea of having all the stuff under the same
license
if possible.
Best regards
-- Dago
_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
