William Bonnet schrieb: >> Nice, is it updated automatically? > Yes it is
How often? :) >> Is there a breakdown by maintainer so >> that everyone can check whether his packages in GAR are already >> correctly >> picked up by these statistics? >> > Soon :) > I work on a more complete version. I choosed to released it soon, so you > have a first list of the package to move. Yep, that's good. Thank you for working on it. > Then i'll add more information, including packages owned by retired > maintainers. >> What do you think about sending an email to each maintainer asking to >> move >> their builds to GAR in case they haven't done so already (including some >> pointers/links to help them get started)? > Sure, but first we need more documentation on GAR. Same for uwatch... Anyone working on the GAR docs right now? If not and you guys don't mind i would revamp the Wiki a bit so that is easier for GAR beginners to find the information they are looking for. Specifically i though about two things: 1) Reordering stuff on the main page and adding some descriptions so that you better know what a topic is about. 2) Adding a _brief_ quickstart HOWTO for using GAR (reusing some info from the Tutorial). >> I guess not everyone is reading >> here on a regular basis (and thus is aware that builds should be moved >> to >> GAR). >> > It is good idea. Do you think guys i should send it soon ? (let say this > week end, time to fix a few things in my script) I don't think everything needs to be 100% perfect. When people start working with GAR now they can easily pick up improvements in upstream watch et al. later. Sebastian _______________________________________________ maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
