Hi Maciej,
Am 26.03.2009 um 12:41 schrieb Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski:
I've seen a lot of project-related resources:
- http://www.opencsw.org
* plain HTML
* for users
* documentation for developers
This is the legacy way of making packages.
- to be superseded by the new website
* for users
* rss feeds
* a wiki
* documentation for developers?
I guess not.
- mantis
* http://www.opencsw.org/bugtrack/
* issue tracking
* for users
To track bugs in released packages. If this is really different from
bugs in GAR is open for discussion :-)
- gar wiki
* http://apps.sourceforge.net/mediawiki/gar/index.php?title=Main_Page
* a wiki
* for developers
* documentation for developers
GAR is not necessarily associated with OpenCSW. I have the idea of GAR
being a site for build-descriptions of maybe multiple packaging projects
*cough*
The wiki contains GAR documentation only.
- gar.sourceforege.net:
* hosts code repository
* issue tracking
* package builds
* GAR code
* code browser
* for developers
- opencsw sourceforge project
* http://opencsw.sourceforge.net
* hosts code repository
* code browser
* for developers
This is for code unrelated to GAR. When the projects forked it was
unclear
which resources we could provide, so I registered this project to use
bugtracking/mailinglist/website/etc. on-demand if necessary. Good there
was no need for it ;-)
- trac
* http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/gar/
* a wiki
* issue tracking
* code browser
* package builds
* documentation for developers
* looks experimental
It is experimental. When we moved GAR-stuff to SourceForge there was no
Trac as hosted app. That's why I converted the docs to MediaWiki.
But I do see the advantages of using Trac as powerful development tool.
Personally I think it would be a good idea to move all developer
resources into SVN and the Trac Wiki.
Is there anything else I missed?
Yes: http://wiki.opencsw.org
Peter set it up when we had no Wiki and the OpenCSW association hadn't
been
founded.
Counting by role:
wikis: 3
issue tracking systems: 3
code repositories: 2
documentation for developers: 3
There seems to be some duplication, especially as far as documentation
for developers is concerned. Are there any plans to consolidate it?
Plans, yes. IMHO it would be a good idea to bundle all developer
resources on the SourceForge "gar" project with SVN as repository
and Trac as Wiki. Feedback welcome.
Best regards
-- Dago
_______________________________________________
maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.opencsw.org/mailman/listinfo/maintainers
